Advanced Management Accounting (P2)
150 questions mapped to the current AICPA & CIMA Management Level blueprint (2026/27). Covers managing the costs of creating value, capital investment decision making, controlling organisational performance, and risk and control. Switch to Exam Sim mode for a timed CIMA P2 mock exam: 60 questions, 90 minutes.
→ P2 Common Mistakes & Exam Technique: the errors that catch P2 students out, and how to avoid them.
The P2 exam format
| Format | Computer-based objective test. All questions are compulsory. |
|---|---|
| Length | 90 minutes, 60 questions. |
| Scoring | Reported as a scaled score from 0 to 150. Questions are weighted by difficulty, so the scaled score is not a straight percentage of questions answered correctly. |
| Pass mark | 100 out of 150. |
| Case Study | Separate from this exam. The Management Case Study is sat after the three management-level objective tests and has its own pass mark of 80 out of 150. |
Always check the current exam format on the AICPA & CIMA website before you sit.
Loading questions…
P2 Formula Sheet: all key formulas on one printable A4 page. Free to download, or see what's on it.
↓ Download PDFSample P2 questions
Three questions from this bank, each with its answer and worked explanation. The quiz above draws from all 150.
Which of the following costs should be included as a relevant cash flow when appraising a new capital investment project?
- The sunk cost of market research already completed before the investment decision
- The depreciation charge that will be recorded on the new asset each year
- The apportioned share of existing head-office overhead that will not change in total
- The incremental annual operating costs that will be incurred only if the project proceeds
Show answer and explanation
Answer: D. Relevant cash flows are those that are incremental — occurring only if the project proceeds — and are actual future cash flows. Incremental annual operating costs meet both criteria and are therefore included. Sunk costs such as past market research spending are irrecoverable regardless of the decision and are excluded. Depreciation is a non-cash accounting charge, not a cash flow, so it is excluded from DCF analysis (though the tax effect of capital allowances may be included separately). Apportioned shares of overhead that do not change in total are not incremental and are therefore irrelevant to the investment decision.
A divisional manager deliberately sets easily achievable budget targets during the budget-setting process. What budgetary behavioural issue does this illustrate?
- Budget slack — building in extra headroom to make targets easier to achieve and reduce the risk of a negative performance variance
- Goal congruence, where individual and organisational objectives are well aligned
- Budget bias, where the manager inflates cost estimates to obtain more resources from head office
- Dysfunctional behaviour, where the manager abandons the budget process altogether
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. Setting deliberately undemanding targets to make them easy to achieve — building in a comfortable margin — is the classic example of budget slack. It protects the manager's performance rating at the cost of the organisation receiving a less ambitious plan. Goal congruence is the alignment of individual and organisational goals, which budget slack actively undermines. Budget bias relates to inflating cost requests to obtain more resources, which is related but distinct. Dysfunctional behaviour more broadly describes actions that conflict with organisational goals; budget slack is a specific form of it, not the general phenomenon of abandoning the process entirely.
Which of the following best describes the key distinction between activity-based costing (ABC) and traditional absorption costing?
- ABC traces costs to products via the activities that drive them, while traditional absorption spreads overheads using a single volume-based rate
- ABC and traditional absorption always produce identical product costs regardless of the production mix
- Traditional absorption is always more accurate than ABC for all product types
- ABC eliminates all overhead costs and therefore always reduces total cost
Show answer and explanation
Answer: A. The key distinction is that ABC traces overhead costs to products via the specific activities that drive those costs — using multiple cost drivers — whereas traditional absorption costing spreads overheads across products using a single volume-based rate (such as labour hours or machine hours). This means the two methods can produce materially different product costs, particularly where the production mix is varied and overheads are not truly volume-driven. ABC does not eliminate overheads; it reallocates them more precisely, and neither system is universally more accurate for every product type.
About this question bank
150 questions across 4 syllabus sections, each mapped to a reference in the official CIMA syllabus for P2 and each with a worked explanation. 116 are multiple choice and 34 are numerical, where you work the answer out before choosing it.
- Written to CIMA's 2019 Professional Qualification syllabus.
- Spotted a mistake? Report it and it will be corrected.
| Syllabus section | Questions |
|---|---|
| A: Costs of Creating Value | 30 |
| B: Capital Investment | 52 |
| C: Performance Control | 45 |
| D: Risk & Control | 23 |